Cited by 1,164Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesClimate Change and Environmental ImpactClimate variability and models

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A new generation of climate change experiments: events, not trends

Jentsch, Anke, Kreyling, Jürgen, Beierkuhnlein, Carl·2007·Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Abstract

Intensification of weather extremes is currently emerging as one of the most important facets of climate change. Research on extreme events (“event-focused” in contrast to “trend-focused”) has increased in recent years and, in 2004, accounted for one-fifth of the experimental climate-change studies published. Numerous examples, ranging from microbiology and soil science to biogeography, demonstrate how extreme weather events can accelerate shifts in species composition and distribution, thereby facilitating changes in ecosystem functioning. However, assessing the importance of extreme events for ecological processes poses a major challenge because of the very nature of such events: their effects are out of proportion to their short duration. We propose that extreme events can be characterized by statistical extremity, timing, and abruptness relative to the life cycles of the organisms affected. To test system response to changing magnitude and frequency of weather events, controlled experiments are useful tools. These experiments provide essential insights for science and for societies that must develop coping strategies for such events. Here, we discuss future research needs for climate-change experiments in ecology. For illustration, we describe an experimental plan showing how to meet the challenge posed by changes in the frequency or magnitude of extreme events.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[365:angoce]2.0.co;2

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<0413:AITTIE>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  2. 10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<0443:IOEWAC>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  3. 10.1034/j.1600-0870.2001.00262.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,164

Metadata

Authors
Jentsch, A., Kreyling, J., & Beierkuhnlein, C.
Affiliations
  • Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
  • University of Bayreuth (DE)
Corresponding author
Jentsch, Anke
Venue
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-09
Volume
5
Issue
7
Pages
365-374
ISSN
1540-9295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050858470
Cited by
1,164
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 84 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 93 · 2013: 90 · 2012: 66
FWCI
19.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
extreme weather events, climate change experiment, event timing, species composition change, range shifts, ecosystem functioning, controlled experiments, coping strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review